Date: January 5, 2026
Summary: This issue invites you into General Seminar S07/E01 (January 14, 10:00 UTC-8) to take the updated AI 2027 Futures Model as a provocation: not something to worship or dunk on, but fuel for critical thinking and speculative imagination. We’ll translate model claims into everyday evidence — design fiction artifacts you can “hold,” like future-archeologists’ finds from a near future where AI is as ordinary as breakfast and as ominous as a USB cable. Alongside the seminar invite, there’s a Dispatches From The Future “Newspaper From An AI Future,” a look back at the 2007 Slow Messenger “theory object,” a note from the ai-modelling-ai channel about the model’s latest claims, and a recommended read: James Auger on speculative design and robots in everyday life. It closes with a few signals from the Nicolas Nova curiosities archive, including UI design archeology via 1990s Kai’s Power Tools.
Essentially: Use the AI 2027 futures update as a prompt to make tangible artifacts, think clearly, and ask what kind of AI future we actually want.
But why? Futures models can trigger hype, dread, and paralysis — especially when they sound confident about timelines and “job obsolescence.” Artifact-making turns abstract claims into legible, discussable evidence, so you can inspect assumptions, surface second-order consequences, and choose boundaries (cultural, ethical, policy) instead of sleepwalking into whatever arrives. The point isn’t prediction; it’s building shared clarity and agency.
|